Does Team Building Work?
Abbreviated Journal Title
Small Group Res.
team building; team performance; team development; ORGANIZATION-DEVELOPMENT; CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; GROUP COHESIVENESS; FIELD EXPERIMENT; TOP MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; INTEGRATION; PARTICIPATION; SALIENCE; Psychology, Applied; Management; Psychology, Social
This research reports the results of a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of team building. The article serves to update and extend Salas, Rozell, Mullen, and Driskell's (1999) team-building meta-analysis by assessing a larger database and examining a broader set of outcomes. Our study considers the impact of four specific team-building components (goal setting, interpersonal relations, problem solving, and role clarification) on cognitive, affective, process, and performance outcomes. Results (based on 60 correlations) suggest that team building has a positive moderate effect across all team outcomes. In terms of specific outcomes, team building was most strongly related to affective and process outcomes. Results are also presented on the differential effectiveness of team building based upon the team size.
Small Group Research
Article; Proceedings Paper
"Does Team Building Work?" (2009). Faculty Bibliography 2000s. 1735.