Title

Interrater reliability in job analysis: Differences in strategy and perspective

Authors

Authors

K. O. Prien; E. P. Prien;W. Wooten

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

Public Personnel Manage.

Keywords

ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK RATINGS; INFORMATION; INCUMBENTS; ADOPTION; SCALES; BIAS; Industrial Relations & Labor; Public Administration

Abstract

In spite of the increasing use of the content validity model for employee selection, there has been little focused research on the psychometric properties of the job analysis ratings used to determine job content. Sources of systematic variance include differences in job performance strategies and differences in perspectives on the job. In the current study, task importance ratings for a single job (social worker) are examined to determine whether rater experience and race will have significant effects on job performance strategy and job perspectives, as measured by job analysis ratings.

Journal Title

Public Personnel Management

Volume

32

Issue/Number

1

Publication Date

1-1-2003

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

125

Last Page

141

WOS Identifier

WOS:000182903500007

ISSN

0091-0260

Share

COinS