The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theory
Abbreviated Journal Title
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.
Organizational justice; Fairness perceptions; Counterfactual thinking; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE RESEARCH; POLICY-CAPTURING APPROACH; RELATIVE; IMPORTANCE; RESPONSIBILITY; JUDGMENTS; THINKING; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGY; DECISIONS; Psychology, Applied; Management; Psychology, Social
This research empirically examines the underlying mechanisms of fairness theory (Folger & Cropanzano, 1998, 2001), namely counterfactual thought processes. Study 1 used a policy-capturing design to examine the relative importance of contextual variables in predicting counterfactual thoughts and fairness perceptions. Study 2 utilized a between-subjects design and asked participants to generate their own. counterfactuals in response to an unfortunate event. Results of both studies showed that fairness perceptions are influenced by contextual variables (i.e., outcome severity, target knowledge and expertise, sin of commission vs. omission) and counterfactual thinking. Counterfactual thoughts partially mediated the effects of contextual variables and fairness perceptions in Study 1. Exploratory analyses from Study 3 revealed that the measurement of counterfactual thoughts (frequency vs. strength) may capture different underlying constructs. Implications are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
"The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theory" (2011). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 7079.