Abstract
This article surveys undergraduate advisors in speech communication programs and law school admissions officers to assess perceptions of speech communication as preparation for law study. Comparative analysis of national questionnaire data explores consensus on desirable lawyer competencies, undergraduate skill development, and the suitability of specific communication courses such as argumentation, persuasion, and interpersonal communication. Findings show broad agreement that oral advocacy and critical reasoning underpin legal practice, yet admissions officers frequently question the rigor and depth of the speech communication major, perceiving applicants from it at a modest disadvantage. Advisors consider the discipline a liberal arts pathway that cultivates analytical reasoning, negotiation, and professional presentation, but acknowledge gaps in law school understanding. The study concludes by recommending stronger interinstitutional dialogue, evidence based curriculum clarification, and cautious advising until disciplinary perceptions align.
Recommended Citation
Matlon, Ronald J.
(1990)
"Perspectives on Academic Advising for Pre-Law Students; Views from Law Schools and the Speech/Communication Discipline,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 73, Article 5.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol73/iss1/5
