Abstract
The sky is falling! The skyis falling! Or is it? Today, courts across the country face a difficult task in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision regarding bankruptcy courts' jurisdiction, Stern v. Marshall. Stern held bankruptcy courts are constitutionally proscribed from entering final judgment based on a private, state-law counterclaim "that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor's proof of claim." A bankruptcy court must now consider Stern when a litigant objects to the court's authority. With over 3,000 adversary proceedings pending in the Middle District of Florida for the month of July 2012 alone, Stern could notably impact how districts manage bankruptcy cases. A broad reading of Stern could mean many bankruptcy matters must be added to the already crowded district courts' dockets, while a narrow reading will only minimally affect the current division of labor.
Recommended Citation
Williams, Nicholas E.
(2013)
"A Guiding Light: Safety Harbor,"
Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 92:
No.
2, Article 14.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol92/iss2/14
Included in
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
