Abstract
Convention papers are examined as a form of professional activity that is often difficult for tenure and promotion committees to assess. The article identifies a paradox in which convention participation is valued as evidence of professional engagement, yet convention papers often receive little weight in personnel decisions because committees lack clear information about their quality or selection process. It proposes a reporting framework that distinguishes among competitively selected papers, invited papers, and papers merely presented or made available at conferences. Particular attention is given to the importance of documenting peer review, selection procedures, and referee evaluations when available. The article argues that clearer description of convention paper status would help tenure and promotion committees evaluate scholarly activity more objectively and distinguish between different levels of professional contribution.
Recommended Citation
Hensley, Wayne E.
(1984)
"Evaluating Convention Papers,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 50, Article 28.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol50/iss1/28
