Abstract
This article responds to arguments about merged and independent department structures in communication-related fields. Drawing on the Department of Communication at the University of Utah, it describes how a formal merger of speech, journalism, speech pathology, and audiology did not immediately create an integrated department, but gradually developed through budget consolidation, shared administrative policies, geographic relocation, and revised leadership roles. The article emphasizes that no single organizational structure suits all institutions and that departments often must adapt to structures shaped by higher administrative decisions. It critiques arguments based mainly on enrollment, required basic courses, public relations, or political influence, and calls attention to broader effects on curriculum, faculty development, research, promotion and tenure, and student learning. The article concludes that successful merged departments require faculty commitment to departmental identity, interdisciplinary cooperation, collegiality, and respect for diverse methods and perspectives within communication studies.
Recommended Citation
Tiemens, Robert K.
(1984)
"A Response to Merged or Independent Departments,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 50, Article 7.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol50/iss1/7
