Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the powers vested in a dean and the conditions under which those powers may be used responsibly or irresponsibly. It identifies multiple forms of power, including rule making, budget control, communication, discretionary funding, staffing, curriculum development, leadership by example, and integrative coordination. Appropriate use of these powers is characterized by openness, consultation, clear procedures, and alignment with institutional goals. Inappropriate use involves secrecy, favoritism, short term expediency, or actions that undermine academic standards and collegial trust. The article argues that the dean’s effectiveness depends on fairness, accessibility, and the ability to unite diverse individuals toward collective aims. When exercised judiciously, these powers enhance institutional development; when misused, they undermine confidence and require corrective intervention.
Recommended Citation
Ranta, Richard R.
(1985)
"The Ideal Dean: Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses of Power,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 52, Article 7.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol52/iss1/7
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
