Abstract
This response essay evaluates preceding analyses of small college administration and extends their implications through a methodologically oriented lens. It begins by addressing the definitional challenges surrounding what constitutes a small department or small liberal arts college, noting that existing definitions remain imprecise and often subjective. Using Allan Tucker’s framework of chairperson responsibilities, the essay proposes a structured means of comparing administrative roles across institutional types. It then examines the claims raised in earlier papers, including the influence of managerial models, the limited authority of departmental leaders, the prevalence of informal communication networks, and the extensive teaching and service commitments characteristic of small college administrators. The discussion argues that these observations suggest possible distinctions between administrative work in small and large institutions, particularly in the distribution of authority, the scope of interpersonal interaction, and the vulnerability of programs with minimal faculty. However, the essay emphasizes that systematic comparative research is required to substantiate such differences and to determine their implications for professional development, leadership preparation, and the design of training initiatives for department chairs. It concludes by questioning whether the department is the most appropriate unit of analysis in very small institutions, suggesting that administrative structures may function more like programs embedded within larger academic units.
Recommended Citation
Roever, James E.
(1985)
"Departmental Administration Within the Small College Environment: Analysis and Extension,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 54, Article 5.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol54/iss1/5
