Abstract
This article analyzes censorship practices in college and university theatre programs from an administrative perspective. Drawing on experiences at Western Carolina University, the discussion illustrates how institutions negotiate artistic freedom alongside sensitivity to community values. Examples of productions that elicited varied audience reactions highlight challenges associated with language, sexual content, violence, nudity, and casting choices. Administrative interviews emphasize a philosophy favoring minimal formal restrictions while encouraging informal consultation between directors and senior leadership to avoid avoidable controversy. Statements from university officials stress the importance of professional judgment, proactive communication, and transparency with audiences, particularly through content advisories and clear publicity. The article also recounts responses to external criticism of a controversial production and presents administrative support for academic freedom when decisions are grounded in thoughtful interpretation rather than gratuitous provocation. The conclusion argues that while occasional audience discomfort is inevitable and even intellectually valuable, directors must balance artistic aims with institutional context and public accountability, ensuring that theatre programs maintain credibility and broad community engagement.
Recommended Citation
Loeffler, Donald L.
(1986)
"Censorship in College and University Theatres: The Administrative Point of View,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 56, Article 10.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol56/iss1/10
