•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This article contends that censorship is present in higher education, although its form and extent vary according to institutional type, mission, and community context. Drawing on examples from public and private universities, particularly in Alabama, the discussion explains that public institutions are bound by First Amendment protections, whereas private colleges may legally prohibit productions that conflict with institutional values or religious commitments. Illustrations from urban universities demonstrate the ability to stage controversial works involving nudity, strong language, and provocative themes, while contrasting cases from religious colleges reveal stricter control over theatrical content. The article reviews legal standards for obscenity and emphasizes that most theatrical works produced in academic settings possess artistic value and therefore fall outside legal definitions of obscenity. Attention is directed to faculty vulnerability, especially for those without tenure, and to the importance of administrative support when controversy arises. The conclusion advises proactive communication with administrators and legal staff, audience advisories, and careful professional judgment to balance artistic expression with institutional responsibilities and community expectations.

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.