Abstract
This article examines censorship in theatre programs at private church related liberal arts colleges, distinguishing these institutions from narrowly doctrinal religious schools. The author defines censorship along a continuum that ranges from artistic judgment exercised within theatre programs to external administrative or community pressure that compels changes to scripts or productions. Internal decisions regarding cuts, staging, and play selection are characterized as professional judgment rather than censorship when made collaboratively by trained theatre personnel. However, administrative or external intervention that overrides departmental authority constitutes censorship and threatens academic freedom. The article acknowledges that theatrical work is uniquely visible and therefore more vulnerable to scrutiny than other academic disciplines, leading to tension between artistic autonomy and institutional accountability. Illustrative cases at Furman University demonstrate strategies for managing complaints, including faculty unity, controlled communication with administrators, and readiness to appeal to national academic organizations. The essay concludes that while the potential for censorship persists, constructive dialogue and clear procedures can transform conflict into opportunities for institutional learning, preserving artistic integrity while maintaining responsible community relations.
Recommended Citation
Hill, Philip G.
(1986)
"Censorship in the Private Church-Related College,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 56, Article 13.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol56/iss1/13
