Abstract
This article analyzes a public controversy surrounding a university production of Equus that included a brief nude scene. The account documents the sequence from initial audience acceptance to a later wave of organized criticism that framed the production as immoral and harmful, culminating in letters to state officials, attempts to reduce institutional funding, and a proposed state bill prohibiting sexual conduct on academic stages. The narrative details the department’s preparations, including informed casting, content advisories, and artistic rationale for the scene within the dramatic structure. Administrative responses by the president, provost, and chancellor are presented as affirmations of academic freedom and artistic integrity, coupled with clear public communication. The controversy threatened a major state award for program excellence, yet the department ultimately received significant recognition and support. The analysis concludes that high quality artistic work, transparent messaging, and principled administrative backing can withstand political and moral pressure. The case illustrates how campus theatre operates at the intersection of community standards, legislative risk, and the university’s obligation to present challenging art.
Recommended Citation
Bassett, Abe J.
(1986)
"Equus: A Case for Censorship?,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 56, Article 14.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol56/iss1/14
