•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This essay extends the discussion of the “Guidelines for Evaluating Teacher/Artists for Promotion and Tenure,” emphasizing the need for consistent implementation and further refinement of evaluation procedures within theatre programs. It situates the Oxford Accord within a broader effort by professional associations to establish equitable standards for assessing creative and pedagogical work in higher education. The analysis identifies two primary objectives: developing comprehensive guidelines for evaluation and ensuring their effective institutional application. The author argues that evaluation must encompass both process and product, recognizing that artistic success cannot be judged solely by outcomes but must consider the educational and creative journey of faculty and students. The essay proposes specific measures, including early and summative evaluations, structured peer review, and the inclusion of external jurors selected according to institutional mission and program type. It concludes by endorsing a model of on-site evaluation supported by professional associations, advocating for transparent procedures that protect artistic integrity while ensuring accountability. The Oxford Accord, as interpreted here, represents a foundational but evolving framework for standardizing the evaluation of teacher-artists.

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.