•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This essay examines the persistent challenges facing designers and theatre technologists in achieving tenure within academic theatre programs. Drawing on administrative experience, the authors argue that attrition among design and technical faculty is not inevitable but rather the product of systemic undervaluation and misunderstanding of their artistic and pedagogical roles. They advocate recognizing these specialists as creative collaborators rather than subservient technicians, urging departments to adopt accurate professional terminology and to treat design and technology as equal to directing, acting, and playwriting. The discussion differentiates among three types of theatre programs: professional training, liberal arts based, and comprehensive, and contends that most institutions operate within the liberal arts model where excessive production demands often undermine faculty sustainability. The authors recommend limiting production schedules, emphasizing quality over quantity, and aligning program goals with institutional missions to prevent burnout and improve retention. For research universities, they affirm that tenure should rest on demonstrable professional achievement and publication. The essay concludes that improving the status and survival of design and technical faculty requires administrative integrity, professional respect, and adherence to realistic academic and creative standards.

Share

COinS
 

Accessibility Statement

This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.