Abstract
This article examines the place of journalism and mass communication within higher education, arguing that the field must be defined more clearly to establish its role in liberal education. It critiques efforts such as the Oregon Report for failing to provide a strong philosophical rationale, contending that journalism is one form of mass communication rather than a separate discipline. The discussion emphasizes process as the core of communication, suggesting that focusing on communication theory and practice provides a more stable foundation than media- or technology-based definitions. Concerns over accreditation standards are highlighted, particularly how rigid credit ratios risk reducing journalism education to vocational training. The article concludes that communication must be understood as a discipline grounded in liberal arts values, with process serving as its intellectual and pedagogical center, ensuring integration with broader educational goals.
Recommended Citation
Bohn, Thomas W.
(1988)
"Professional and Liberal Education,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 64, Article 4.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol64/iss1/4
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
