Abstract
This article examines the debates surrounding promotion, tenure, and merit decisions in higher education, emphasizing their emotional and professional impact on faculty and administrators. It argues that while teaching, research, and service remain the universal standards, their application varies widely across institutions and disciplines. Using the example of a theatre and dance program, the discussion highlights how criteria are adapted to reflect program needs, such as valuing creative contributions in production alongside research and teaching. It also underscores the importance of collaboration, community service, and the recognition of program uniqueness. The article concludes that academic evaluations should account for institutional diversity rather than relying solely on standardized definitions of quality, since reputations are often built on distinctive contributions rather than conformity.
Recommended Citation
Bahs, Clarence W.
(1988)
"Different Strokes,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 65, Article 9.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol65/iss1/9
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2026, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
