Abstract
This article explores the rationale for pursuing NAST accreditation in collegiate theatre education, distinguishing between misplaced expectations and practical advantages. Through analytical discussion of program evaluation, it contends that accreditation rarely guarantees immediate gains in funding, staffing, or facilities, yet requires substantial investment in self study, site visitation, and annual dues. Nonetheless, this article argues that the accreditation process yields strategic benefits, including national recognition of curricular quality, standardized assessment metrics, discipline specific data gathering, and strengthened accountability to administrators and external stakeholders. By framing accreditation as a collective endeavor that informs faculty workload analyses, budget planning, and educational standards, this article concludes that timely involvement with NAST nurtures institutional credibility and advances the broader discourse on professional training in theatre programs.
Recommended Citation
Drapeau, Donald A.
(1989)
"Should Theatre Programs Be NAST Accredited?,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 70, Article 15.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol70/iss1/15
