Abstract
This article surveys recent legal and institutional pressures on campus free expression, outlining proactive strategies for communication administrators. After tracing the historical legacy of the Free Speech Movement and examining contemporary racist and sexist speech codes, the discussion analyzes seminal Supreme Court decisions including Fraser and Hazelwood, focusing on their implications for the public forum doctrine within universities. The legal review demonstrates how vague or overbroad regulations chill academic freedom, while judicial ambiguity complicates policy design. Drawing on constitutional law, organizational communication, and leadership studies, the article proposes five guidelines: defend student media autonomy, craft clear position statements, teach responsible language use, reassess restrictive codes, and anticipate backlash. By integrating rhetoric, policy analysis, and educational leadership, this article provides a balanced framework for safeguarding First Amendment values while fostering inclusive campus climates.
Recommended Citation
Giil, Ann M.
(1991)
"Renewed Concern for Free Speech On Campus,"
Association for Communication Administration Bulletin: Vol. 75, Article 7.
Available at:
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/aca/vol75/iss1/7
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
