ORCID

0009-0002-2571-0407

Keywords

plain language, jury instructions, comprehension, legal language, fluency, juror comprehension

Abstract

Extant literature indicates there are significant problems related to how jurors comprehend instructions. Cognitive fluency literature explains that when information is presented in plain language, it enhances cognitive fluency by reducing the cognitive load on the reader or listener. Therefore, utilizing a quantitative experiment, this study sought to explore the use of plain language and its role when presenting instructions to jurors. A total of 212 participants were randomly assigned to one of the two jury instruction conditions and one of the six case facts, where they were asked to read a hypothetical self-defense case scenario followed by the corresponding jury instructions. The study found that participants with plain language instructions reported higher comprehension, comprehension confidence, and cognitive fluency levels than those with standard instructions. Additionally, cognitive fluency was found to mediate the relationship between instruction type and comprehension confidence. The results suggest that the use of plain language in jury instructions can improve juror comprehension, confidence, and ease of processing, ultimately leading to a more positive juror experience. These findings have important implications for the legal system and highlight the need for continued research on the use of plain language in legal documents.

Completion Date

2024

Semester

Fall

Committee Chair

Weger, Harry

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

College

College of Sciences

Department

Nicholson School of Communication and Media

Degree Program

Strategic Communication

Format

PDF

Identifier

DP0029049

Language

English

Release Date

12-15-2024

Access Status

Dissertation

Campus Location

UCF Downtown

Accessibility Status

PDF accessibility verified using Adobe Acrobat Pro Accessibility Checker

Share

COinS