Title
The validity of handwriting elements in relation to self-report personality trait measures
Abbreviated Journal Title
Pers. Individ. Differ.
Keywords
Psychology, Social
Abstract
Research on graphology has provided mixed results regarding its validity in applied settings. Increasing popularity of this method (Edwards & Armitage, 1991) calls for continued evaluation. The current study sought to validate a popular graphoanalysis method proposed by Bunker (1979), which links specific handwriting elements to personality traits. Content-neutral handwriting of 49 college students was analyzed for 30 elements (e.g, length of t-cross) by two trained coders working independently. Participants also completed the Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised (JPI-R; Jackson, 1994), which measures 15 normal personality traits. Inter-rater agreement in handwriting analysis was moderately high (median reliability = 0.80). Both predicted and non-predicted correlations between handwriting elements and JPI-R scales were significant at around chance levels (i.e. 5%). In particular, of the 119 predicted relations, only six (5.0%) were significant in the expected direction and five (4.1%) were significant in the opposite direction. All told, current findings replicate those of previous studies and suggest limited value in handwriting analysis as a predictive tool. Copyright (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Journal Title
Personality and Individual Differences
Volume
22
Issue/Number
1
Publication Date
1-1-1997
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
11
Last Page
18
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0191-8869
Recommended Citation
"The validity of handwriting elements in relation to self-report personality trait measures" (1997). Faculty Bibliography 1990s. 2114.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib1990/2114
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu