Title
Toward A Theory Of Agenda Setting In Negotiations
Abbreviated Journal Title
J. Consum. Res.
Keywords
Buyer-Seller Negotiations; Self-Serving Biases; Bilateral Negotiations; Attributional Search; Causal Attribution; Exchange Processes; Future; Interaction; Decision-Making; People Ask; Satisfaction; Business
Abstract
To date, negotiation research in two-party situations has largely focused on single issues or on multiple issues bargained simultaneously. In this paper, we develop, from a behavioral perspective, a conceptual framework and an associated set of propositions concerning the influence and interaction of a number of factors on agenda setting. We examine the consequences of negotiating multiple issues sequentially as opposed to discussing them simultaneously. Specifically, we posit (a) conditions under which sequential versus simultaneous negotiations are advantageous, (b) conditions that promote and inhibit integrative agreements between parties involved in sequential negotiations, and (c) conditions that foster greater utility and timeliness to the negotiating parties. In addition, directions for future research and methodological guidelines for testing the propositions are discussed.
Journal Title
Journal of Consumer Research
Volume
19
Issue/Number
4
Publication Date
1-1-1993
Document Type
Review
Language
English
First Page
637
Last Page
654
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0093-5301
Recommended Citation
"Toward A Theory Of Agenda Setting In Negotiations" (1993). Faculty Bibliography 1990s. 635.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib1990/635
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu