Title
Measuring information system service quality: Servqual from the other side
Abbreviated Journal Title
Mis Q.
Keywords
service quality; measurement; SERVQUAL; user expectations; DIFFERENCE; VARIABLES; Computer Science, Information Systems; Information Science & Library; Science; Management
Abstract
There has been much debate as of late over the use of the SERVQUAL instrument to measure Information Systems service quality. Detractors argue that the difference score leads to unreliable measures and that the dimensionality and validity is erratic. Proponents argue for the diagnostic power of the gap between expectations and perceived delivery while demonstrating some empirical stability and reliability. To extend the discussion requires the examination of the instrument from the viewpoint of the information system professional. Importantly, a large variety of samples must view the instrument and measures in the same light for the instrument to have applicability. Likewise, analysis of differences between users and providers requires that both populations have similar structural views of the instrument. Empirical evidence collected from information system professionals demonstrated a structure similar to previously published studies with adequate reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The structure is the same as is found for a gap between users and IS professionals.
Journal Title
Mis Quarterly
Volume
26
Issue/Number
2
Publication Date
1-1-2002
Document Type
Article
DOI Link
Language
English
First Page
145
Last Page
166
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0276-7783
Recommended Citation
"Measuring information system service quality: Servqual from the other side" (2002). Faculty Bibliography 2000s. 3271.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2000/3271
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu