Title

Diversity in state and federal appellate courts: Change and continuity across 20 years

Authors

Authors

M. S. Hurwitz;D. N. Lanier

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

Justice Syst. J.

Keywords

JUDICIAL SELECTION; SUPREME COURTS; GENDER; JUDGE; DIVERSIFICATION; RECRUITMENT; NOMINATION; DIFFERENCE; SYSTEMS; WOMEN; Law

Abstract

We examine the levels of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity and use of selection systems in state and federal appellate courts in the United States for the year 2005 and compare them with our earlier findings for a twenty-year period. We observe no recent increases in the number of state courts employing the merit system of selection, and other systems also remain stable, as continuity currently defines the types of selection systems used in the states. However, we find an increasing number and percentage of state and federal appellate judges who are women and members of racial and ethnic minorities, with change being the order of the day for these nontraditional judges joining the bench. Finally, we show that particular methods of selection are unrelated to rates of judicial diversity. Specifically, we find that the merit system, once derided by some as disfavoring nontraditional judges, continues to have no apparent association with diversity. While there are myriad rationales for state policy makers to choose one particular selection method over any other, our findings affirm, once again, that associated levels of diversity need not be included in that decision.

Journal Title

Justice System Journal

Volume

29

Issue/Number

1

Publication Date

1-1-2008

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

47

Last Page

70

WOS Identifier

WOS:000254206900004

ISSN

0098-261X

Share

COinS