Title
The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study
Abbreviated Journal Title
J.Environ.Econ.Manage.
Keywords
field experiment; endangered species; non-market valuation; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PUBLIC-GOODS; COOPERATION; PROGRAMS; Business; Economics; Environmental Studies
Abstract
Standard applications of utility theory assume that utility depends solely on outcomes and not on causes. This study uses a field experiment conducted in the Netherlands to determine if alternative causes of an environmental problem affect willingness to pay to ameliorate it. We find evidence supporting the hypothesis that people are willing to pay significantly more to correct problems caused by humans than by nature (the "outrage effect"), but find no support for the hypothesis that "moral responsibility" matters. We also find support for the hypothesis that stated willingness to pay values obtained via "cheap talk" and "consequential" treatments are lower than without inclusion of these protocols. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal Title
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume
49
Issue/Number
2
Publication Date
1-1-2005
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
330
Last Page
342
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0095-0696
Recommended Citation
"The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study" (2005). Faculty Bibliography 2000s. 5019.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2000/5019
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu