The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study

    Authors

    E. Bulte; S. Gerking; J. A. List;A. de Zeeuw

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    J.Environ.Econ.Manage.

    Keywords

    field experiment; endangered species; non-market valuation; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PUBLIC-GOODS; COOPERATION; PROGRAMS; Business; Economics; Environmental Studies

    Abstract

    Standard applications of utility theory assume that utility depends solely on outcomes and not on causes. This study uses a field experiment conducted in the Netherlands to determine if alternative causes of an environmental problem affect willingness to pay to ameliorate it. We find evidence supporting the hypothesis that people are willing to pay significantly more to correct problems caused by humans than by nature (the "outrage effect"), but find no support for the hypothesis that "moral responsibility" matters. We also find support for the hypothesis that stated willingness to pay values obtained via "cheap talk" and "consequential" treatments are lower than without inclusion of these protocols. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Journal Title

    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

    Volume

    49

    Issue/Number

    2

    Publication Date

    1-1-2005

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    330

    Last Page

    342

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000227477800007

    ISSN

    0095-0696

    Share

    COinS