Title
The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE
Abbreviated Journal Title
J. Financ. Mark.
Keywords
specialists; market makers; bid-ask spreads; options; competition; TRADE EXECUTION COSTS; EQUITY OPTIONS; AUCTION MARKETS; NASDAQ; NYSE; COMPETITION; SPREADS; Business, Finance
Abstract
Using intraday options data, this paper analyzes the "natural experiment" of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) superimposing a specialist system on an existing multiple market maker system during 1999. We find support for the demand uncertainty literature which states that specialists are better able to resolve uncertainty about investor preferences. In particular, we find that quoted, current, and effective spreads decrease following the specialist system adoption. This translates into a $221 million annual savings for investors. We further find that following the switch, the market share of the CBOE increases significantly, suggesting that specialists use spreads to attract order flow. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Journal Title
Journal of Financial Markets
Volume
9
Issue/Number
2
Publication Date
1-1-2006
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
100
Last Page
118
WOS Identifier
ISSN
1386-4181
Recommended Citation
"The value of the specialist: Empirical evidence from the CBOE" (2006). Faculty Bibliography 2000s. 5904.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2000/5904
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu