Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods

Authors

    Authors

    G. W. Harrison

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Environ. Resour. Econ.

    Keywords

    experiments; valuation; hypothetical bias; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; EXPERIMENTAL AUCTION MARKETS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; FIELD EXPERIMENT; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; VALUE-ELICITATION; VALUES; DESIGN; ACCEPT; Economics; Environmental Studies

    Abstract

    Experimental methods are central to assessments of environmental valuation approaches that are operationally meaningful. Existing lab experiments focus attention sharply on the neglect of hypothetical bias. They also offer constructive solutions to correct this bias, and beg for validation in field experiments.

    Journal Title

    Environmental & Resource Economics

    Volume

    34

    Issue/Number

    1

    Publication Date

    1-1-2006

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    125

    Last Page

    162

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000236615400008

    ISSN

    0924-6460

    Share

    COinS