COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY
Abbreviated Journal Title
Evolution
Keywords
amphibians; population genetics; genetic diversity; Ranidae; conservation genetics; NORTHERN LEOPARD FROG; SOUTHWESTERN BRITISH-COLUMBIA; LONG-TOED; SALAMANDER; GENETIC-STRUCTURE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; SPOTTED FROG; LANDSCAPE GENETICS; PRETIOSA-PRETIOSA; AURORA-AURORA; DIVERSITY; Ecology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics & Heredity
Abstract
It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N-e) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N-e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N-e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species (20-26 populations per species, mean n per population = 29). Our objectives were to determine typical values of N-e for populations of each species, compare N-e estimates among the species, and test for correlations between several geographic variables and N-e within species. We used single-sample linkage disequilibrium (LD), approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), and sibship assignment (SA) methods to estimate contemporary N-e for each population. Three of the species-Rana pretiosa, R. luteiventris, and R. cascadae-have consistently small effective population sizes ( < 50). N-e in Lithobates pipiens spans a wider range, with some values in the hundreds or thousands. There is a strong east-to-west trend of decreasing N-e in L. pipiens. The smaller effective sizes of western populations of this species may be related to habitat fragmentation and population bottlenecking.
Journal Title
Evolution
Volume
65
Issue/Number
10
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
2927
Last Page
2945
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0014-3820
Recommended Citation
"COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY" (2011). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 1763.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/1763
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]