OROPHARYNGEAL SECRETION VOLUME IN INTUBATED PATIENTS: THE IMPORTANCE OF ORAL SUCTIONING

    Authors

    M. L. Sole; D. A. Penoyer; M. Bennett; J. Bertrand;S. Talbert

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Am. J. Crit. Care

    Keywords

    VENTILATOR-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA; CONTINUOUS ASPIRATION; SUBGLOTTIC; SECRETIONS; CARE; PREVENTION; POSITION; SURGERY; REDUCE; TRIAL; TUBE; Critical Care Medicine; Nursing

    Abstract

    Background Aspiration of secretions that accumulate above the cuff of the endotracheal tube is a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Routine suctioning of oropharyngeal secretions may reduce this risk; the recommended frequency for suctioning is unknown. Objectives To quantify the volume of secretions suctioned from the oropharynx of critically ill patients at 2 different intervals to assist in identifying a recommended frequency for oropharyngeal suctioning. Methods A prospective, repeated measure, single-group design was used. Twenty-eight patients who were orally intubated and treated with mechanical ventilation were enrolled; 2 were extubated during data collection, yielding a sample of 26 patients. The patients were suctioned at baseline with a deep suction catheter, and the volume and weight of secretions were recorded. The procedure was repeated at 2-hour and 4-hour intervals. Results Most of the patients were male (mean age, 49 years). Three suctioning passes were needed to clear secretions, with a mean time of 48.1 seconds. The mean volume of secretions at the 2-hour interval was 7.5 mL. Five patients required suctioning before the 4-hour interval. For the remaining 21 patients, the volume retrieved was 6.5 mL at the 2-hour interval and 7.5 mL at the 4-hour interval (P=.27). The 5 patients who required extra suctioning had significantly more secretions at the 2-hour interval (11.6 mL vs 6.5 mL; P=.05). Conclusions A minimum frequency of oropharyngeal suctioning every 4 hours is recommended. However, more frequent suctioning may be needed in a subset of patients. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2011;20:e141-e145)

    Journal Title

    American Journal of Critical Care

    Volume

    20

    Issue/Number

    6

    Publication Date

    1-1-2011

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    E141

    Last Page

    E145

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000296657500003

    ISSN

    1062-3264

    Share

    COinS
     

    Accessibility Statement

    This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.