A direct test of direct democracy: New England town meetings
Abbreviated Journal Title
Appl. Econ.
Keywords
median voter; direct democracy; representative democracy; revealed; preference; MEDIAN VOTER MODEL; GOVERNMENTS; CHOICE; DEMAND; Economics
Abstract
Representative democracies govern most locales in the US, making it difficult to compare performance relative to direct democracy. New England states, however, provide an opportunity to test both direct and representative democracy at the local level. This article uses revealed preference axioms to compare spending patterns in New England towns and cities against median voter hypothesis benchmarks. Contrary to previous evidence, we find no differences between direct and representative democracy. The results suggest that horizontal competition arising from local fragmentation minimize differences between direct and representative local government, providing support for wider applicability of median voter-based empirical models of local government behaviour in the US.
Journal Title
Applied Economics
Volume
44
Issue/Number
18
Publication Date
1-1-2012
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
2393
Last Page
2402
WOS Identifier
ISSN
0003-6846
Recommended Citation
"A direct test of direct democracy: New England town meetings" (2012). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 3239.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/3239
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]