Title

Team Knowledge Research: Emerging Trends and Critical Needs

Authors

Authors

J. L. Wildman; A. L. Thayer; D. Pavlas; E. Salas; J. E. Stewart;W. R. Howse

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

Hum. Factors

Keywords

shared mental models; transactive memory; cognition; group; methodology; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY-SYSTEMS; SHARED MENTAL MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; TEAMS; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS; AIR-TRAFFIC-CONTROL; SITUATION AWARENESS; COGNITIVE UNDERPINNINGS; ENTREPRENEURIAL TEAMS; VENTURE PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; Behavioral Sciences; Engineering, Industrial; Ergonomics; Psychology, ; Applied; Psychology

Abstract

Objective: This article provides a systematic review of the team knowledge literature and guidance for further research. Background: Recent research has called attention to the need for the improved study and understanding of team knowledge. Team knowledge refers to the higher level knowledge structures that emerge from the interactions of individual team members. Method: We conducted a systematic review of the team knowledge literature, focusing on empirical work that involves the measurement of team knowledge constructs. For each study, we extracted author degree area, study design type, study setting, participant type, task type, construct type, elicitation method, aggregation method, measurement timeline, and criterion domain. Results: Our analyses demonstrate that many of the methodological characteristics of team knowledge research can be linked back to the academic training of the primary author and that there are considerable gaps in our knowledge with regard to the relationships between team knowledge constructs, the mediating mechanisms between team knowledge and performance, and relationships with criteria outside of team performance, among others. We also identify categories of team knowledge not yet examined based on an organizing framework derived from a synthesis of the literature. Conclusion: There are clear opportunities for expansion in the study of team knowledge; the science of team knowledge would benefit from a more holistic theoretical approach. Application: Human factors researchers are increasingly involved in the study of teams. This review and the resulting organizing framework provide researchers with a summary of team knowledge research over the past 10 years and directions for improving further research.

Journal Title

Human Factors

Volume

54

Issue/Number

1

Publication Date

1-1-2012

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

84

Last Page

111

WOS Identifier

WOS:000299292200008

ISSN

0018-7208

Share

COinS