Renyi entropies as a measure of the complexity of counting problems
Abbreviated Journal Title
J. Stat. Mech.-Theory Exp.
Keywords
typical-case computational complexity; Mechanics; Physics, Mathematical
Abstract
Counting problems such as determining how many bit strings satisfy a given Boolean logic formula are notoriously hard. In many cases, even getting an approximate count is difficult. Here we propose that entanglement, a common concept in quantum information theory, may serve as a telltale of the difficulty of counting exactly or approximately. We quantify entanglement by using Renyi entropies S-(q), which we define by bipartitioning the logic variables of a generic satisfiability problem. We conjecture that S-(q -> 0) provides information about the difficulty of counting solutions exactly, while S-(q > 0) indicates the possibility of carrying out an efficient approximate counting. We test this conjecture by employing a matrix computing scheme to numerically solve #2SAT problems for a large number of uniformly distributed instances. We find that all Renyi entropies scale linearly with the number of variables in the case of the #2SAT problem; this is consistent with the fact that neither exact nor efficient approximate algorithms are known for this problem. However, for the negated (disjunctive) form of the problem, S-(q -> 0) scales linearly while S-(q > 0) tends to zero when the number of variables is large. These results are consistent with the existence of fully polynomial-time randomized approximate algorithms for counting solutions of disjunctive normal forms and suggest that efficient algorithms for the conjunctive normal form may not exist.
Journal Title
Journal of Statistical Mechanics-Theory and Experiment
Publication Date
1-1-2013
Document Type
Article
Language
English
First Page
13
WOS Identifier
ISSN
1742-5468
Recommended Citation
"Renyi entropies as a measure of the complexity of counting problems" (2013). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 3772.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/3772
Accessibility Statement
This item was created or digitized prior to April 24, 2027, or is a reproduction of legacy media created before that date. It is preserved in its original, unmodified state specifically for research, reference, or historical recordkeeping. In accordance with the ADA Title II Final Rule, the University Libraries provides accessible versions of archival materials upon request. To request an accommodation for this item, please submit an accessibility request form.
Comments
Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at [email protected]