Title

Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study

Authors

Authors

J. T. Connor; B. R. Luce; K. R. Broglio; K. J. Ishak; C. D. Mullins; D. J. Vanness; R. Fleurence; E. Saunders;B. R. Davis

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

Clin. Trials

Keywords

RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; DESIGN; Medicine, Research & Experimental

Abstract

Background Randomized clinical trials, particularly for comparative effectiveness research (CER), are frequently criticized for being overly restrictive or untimely for health-care decision making. Purpose Our prospectively designed REsearch in ADAptive methods for Pragmatic Trials (RE-ADAPT) study is a 'proof of concept' to stimulate investment in Bayesian adaptive designs for future CER trials. Methods We will assess whether Bayesian adaptive designs offer potential efficiencies in CER by simulating a re-execution of the Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) study using actual data from ALLHAT. Results We prospectively define seven alternate designs consisting of various combinations of arm dropping, adaptive randomization, and early stopping and describe how these designs will be compared to the original ALLHAT design. We identify the one particular design that would have been executed, which incorporates early stopping and information-based adaptive randomization. Limitations While the simulation realistically emulates patient enrollment, interim analyses, and adaptive changes to design, it cannot incorporate key features like the involvement of data monitoring committee in making decisions about adaptive changes. Conclusion This article describes our analytic approach for RE-ADAPT. The next stage of the project is to conduct the re-execution analyses using the seven prespecified designs and the original ALLHAT data.

Journal Title

Clinical Trials

Volume

10

Issue/Number

5

Publication Date

1-1-2013

Document Type

Article; Proceedings Paper

DOI Link

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774513497293

Language

English

First Page

807

Last Page

827

WOS Identifier

WOS:000330526300020

ISSN

1740-7745

Recommended Citation

"Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study" (2013). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 3825.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/3825