Title

Informant Discrepancies in Adult Social Anxiety Disorder Assessments: Links With Contextual Variations in Observed Behavior

Authors

Authors

A. De Los Reyes; B. E. Bunnell;D. C. Beidel

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

J. Abnorm. Psychol.

Keywords

correspondence; informant discrepancies; multiple informants; Operations; Triad Model; social anxiety disorder; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; RATING SCALE; DSM-V; PHOBIA; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; INVENTORY; CHILDREN; YOUTHS; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDHOOD; Psychology, Clinical; Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Abstract

Multi-informant assessments of adult psychopathology often result in discrepancies among informants' reports. Among 157 adults meeting criteria for either the generalized (n = 106) or nongeneralized (n = 51) social anxiety disorder (SAD) subtype, we examined whether discrepancies between patients' and clinicians' reports of patients' symptoms related to variations in both SAD subtype and expressions of social skills deficits across multiple social interaction tasks. Latent class analyses revealed two behavioral patterns: (a) context-specific social skills deficits and (b) cross-context social skills deficits. Similarly, patients' symptom reports could be characterized by concordance or discordance with clinicians' reports. Patient clinician concordance on relatively high levels of patients' symptoms related to an increased likelihood of the patient meeting criteria for the generalized relative to nongeneralized subtype. Further, patient clinician concordance on relatively high levels of patients' symptoms related to an increased likelihood of consistently exhibiting social skills deficits across social interaction tasks (relative to context-specific social skills deficits). These relations were robust in accounting for patient age, clinical severity, and Axis I and II comorbidity. Further, clinical severity did not completely explain variability in patients' behavior on laboratory tasks or discrepancies between patient and clinician reports. Findings provide the first laboratory-based support for the ability of informant discrepancies to indicate cross-contextual variability in clinical adult assessments, and the first of any developmental period to indicate this for SAD assessments. These findings have important implications for clinical assessment and developmental psychopathology research.

Journal Title

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Volume

122

Issue/Number

2

Publication Date

1-1-2013

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

376

Last Page

386

WOS Identifier

WOS:000319241100008

ISSN

0021-843X

Share

COinS