Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population

    Authors

    E. Lobato; J. Mendoza; V. Sims;M. Chin

    Comments

    Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

    Abbreviated Journal Title

    Appl. Cogn. Psychol.

    Keywords

    ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; THINKING STYLES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY; EVOLUTION; COMPLEMENTARY; CREATIONISM; SCHIZOTYPY; KNOWLEDGE; EDUCATION; Psychology, Experimental

    Abstract

    Very little research has investigated whether believing in paranormal, conspiracy, and pseudoscientific claims are related, even though they share the property of having no epistemic warrant. The present study investigated the association between these categories of epistemically unwarranted beliefs. Results revealed moderate to strong positive correlations between the three categories of epistemically unwarranted beliefs, suggesting that believers in one type tended to also endorse other types. In addition, one individual difference measure, looking at differences in endorsing ontological confusions, was found to be predictive of both paranormal and conspiracy beliefs. Understanding the relationship between peoples' beliefs in these types of claims has theoretical implications for research into why individuals believe empirically unsubstantiated claims. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Journal Title

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    Volume

    28

    Issue/Number

    5

    Publication Date

    1-1-2014

    Document Type

    Article

    Language

    English

    First Page

    617

    Last Page

    625

    WOS Identifier

    WOS:000342671200001

    ISSN

    0888-4080

    Share

    COinS