Title

Homohysteria: Useful Construct? Or an Unnecessary Splitting of Hairs?

Authors

Authors

C. Negy

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

Sex Roles

Keywords

Homophobia; Homonegativity; Gendered Behaviors; Prejudice; Discrimination; Sexual Orientation; Attitudes; PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION; GAY MEN; MASCULINITY; PSYCHOLOGY; HOMOPHOBIA; PREJUDICE; HEALTH; SPORT; Psychology, Developmental; Psychology, Social; Women's Studies

Abstract

In this commentary to McCormack and Anderson (2014, this issue), I offer my reaction to a relatively new construct-homohysteria-that characterizes heterosexual men's negative attitudes and affective reactions toward gay men in the context of gendered (traditional) behaviors. I propose that similar to other forms of "isms" used in both academia and the general community (e.g., racism, sexism), little is to be gained by continuing to splinter established terms such as heterosexism or homophobia. More specifically, I argue that by creating new terms for prejudice against gays and lesbians-terms that simply reflect either different degrees or motives of heterosexism-we risk muddling research findings and ultimately trivializing the pernicious phenomenon of prejudice and discrimination against the LGBT community. I also argue that in the absence of empirical support for the validity of homohysteria (as a distinct construct from heterosexism or homophobia), those embracing this new term are investigatively putting the cart before the horse.

Journal Title

Sex Roles

Volume

71

Issue/Number

3-4

Publication Date

1-1-2014

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

137

Last Page

140

WOS Identifier

WOS:000342172600004

ISSN

0360-0025

Share

COinS