Title

Self-Silencing to Sexism

Authors

Authors

J. K. Swim; K. M. Eyssell; E. Q. Murdoch;M. J. Ferguson

Comments

Authors: contact us about adding a copy of your work at STARS@ucf.edu

Abbreviated Journal Title

J. Soc. Issues

Keywords

COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SOCIAL COSTS; DISCRIMINATION; PREJUDICE; RESPONSES; ATTRIBUTIONS; EXPERIENCES; DEPRESSION; ETHNICITY; IMPACT; Social Issues; Psychology, Social

Abstract

Women's endorsement of beliefs that prioritize others' voices over their own (i.e., self-silencing beliefs) predicted behaviorally self-silenced to everyday, interpersonal forms of sexism. Self-silencing beliefs, which are consistent with prescriptive gender roles for women, indicate that one should avoid conflict in relationships, put others needs over one's own, accept a discrepancy between one's personal and public self, and judge one's behaviors by external standards. Results from a diary study indicate that the more U.S. college women endorsed self-silencing beliefs the less likely they wanted to respond to sexist incidents and, if they wanted to respond to incidents, the more they verbally restrained their responses to everyday sexism and other stressful incidents. The results suggest that, when addressing women's tendency to self-silence to incidents, one should address women's gender-role consistent beliefs about how they should behave in interpersonal interactions.

Journal Title

Journal of Social Issues

Volume

66

Issue/Number

3

Publication Date

1-1-2010

Document Type

Article

Language

English

First Page

493

Last Page

507

WOS Identifier

WOS:000281550500005

ISSN

0022-4537

Share

COinS