Secondary Author(s)
Withers Jr., Charles
Report Number
FSEC-CR-1668-98
URL
http://publications.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/FSEC-CR-1668-98.pdf
Keywords
Ducts; Air Flow; Buildings, Building cavities; Air leakage; Commercial buildings; Duct leakage; Airtightness standards; Pressure differentials; Humidity impacts; Energy efficiency
Abstract
Field testing in 70 small commercial buildings in central Florida identified that building cavities were used as part of the air distribution system in 33 buildings. The various building cavity types (# of buildings in parentheses) are: enclosed air handler support platforms (10), mechanical closets (8), mechanical rooms (6), ceiling spaces (7), wall cavities (6), chases (1), and "other" building cavities (2). Testing found that these building cavities are considerably more leaky than standard ducts and plenums because they are generally not built to the same airtightness standard as ducts. Actual air leakage is a function not only of duct hole size but also pressure differential across the leak sites. Pressure differentials generally range from -0.080 in WC (-20 pascals) to -0.401 in WC (-100 pascals) in support platforms, mechanical closets and rooms, wall cavities, and chases. By contrast, ceiling plenums often operate at less than 0.004 in WC (1 pascal) difference from the occupied space and sometimes at positive pressure with respect to outdoors.
The energy, infiltration, and relative humidity impacts of building cavity duct leakage depend upon the leak air flow rate and the temperature and humidity conditions of the air entering the leaks. Therefore, the location of the building cavity ducts is very important. If the return leak air is drawn from the occupied space, that leakage will have little or no impact on energy, infiltration, or relative humidity. At the other extreme, if the leaking air comes from a hot and humid attic space, the impacts will be large. The interaction of various building cavity duct leaks with eight different building configurations -- based on the location of the primary air and thermal boundaries in the ceiling space -- is discussed. The paper concludes that building cavities should not, as a general rule, be used as a part of the air distribution system. The exception is use of ceiling space return plenums. Ceiling plenums can be designed to operate at near neutral pressure with respect to outdoors and therefore can experience little or no duct leakage.
Date Published
1-1-1998
Identifiers
733
Subjects
Buildings--Energy conservation; Concrete stoppings (Mining)--Airtightness; Commercial buildings; Air ducts; Humidity--Control; Pressure--Measurement; Building materials--Standards
Local Subjects
Buildings - Air Flow; Buildings - Ducts
Type
Text; Document
Collection
FSEC Energy Research Center® Collection
STARS Citation
Florida Solar Energy Center and Cummings, James, "Building Cavities Used as Ducts: Air Leakage Characteristics and Impacts in Light Commercial Buildings" (1998). FSEC Energy Research Center®. 733.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fsec/733
Included in
Rights Statement
Notes
Reference Publication: Cummings, J. B. and C.R. Withers. "Building Cavities Used as Ducts: Air Leakage Characteristics and Impacts in Light Commercial Buildings". ASHRAE Transactions, 1998, Vol.104, Part 2, p.743 752.