Title
Evidence And The Liking Bias: Effects On Managers' Disciplinary Actions
Keywords
biasing effects; discharge decisions; disciplinary actions; evidence; liking
Abstract
Managers confronted with evidence of employee misconduct were biased in their recommendations for disciplinary action depending on whether they liked or disliked the accused employee. As expected, when evidence was strong, managers more frequently recommended that the subordinate receive assistance-focused and punishment-focused disciplinary action than when evidence was weak. When managers indicated they liked the employee, they were not inclined to suggest use of disciplinary actions but endorsed use of discipline when they disliked the accused employee. Joint effects of evidence and liking were found for assistance-focused and punishment-focused actions. Implications and the relevance of the biasing effects of managers' recommended actions are discussed. © 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Publication Date
12-1-1990
Publication Title
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume
3
Issue
4
Number of Pages
253-265
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384932
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0001482934 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0001482934
STARS Citation
Fandt, Patricia M.; Labig, Chalmer E.; and Urich, Andrew L., "Evidence And The Liking Bias: Effects On Managers' Disciplinary Actions" (1990). Scopus Export 1990s. 1475.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus1990/1475