Title
The Effects Of Realistic Versus Unrealistic Desktop Interface Designs On Novice And Expert Users
Abstract
Metaphors are one tool which designers have used to bridge the gap between technology and the novice user. While metaphors work in theory, often the metaphor falls apart or breaks down during seemingly logical procedures. It would stand to reason that a metaphor which approximates the human-environment interaction, and remains consistent in the analogy, would be a more valid test of the benefits of a metaphor. In this study, novice and expert subjects were given a set of four computer-based, editing tasks, each of which was composed of six subtasks. The dependent variable was time to complete the task. It was found that novice subjects significantly benefited from the use of the realistic desktop design, while there were no significant differences in the performance of expert users. © 1995 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
1-1-1995
Publication Title
Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics
Volume
20
Issue
B
Number of Pages
123-128
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-2647(06)80205-4
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
77957098135 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/77957098135
STARS Citation
Miller, L. A. and Stanney, K. M., "The Effects Of Realistic Versus Unrealistic Desktop Interface Designs On Novice And Expert Users" (1995). Scopus Export 1990s. 1750.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus1990/1750