Title
Remnants of Parens Patriae in the Adjudicatory Hearing: Is a Fair Trial Possible in Juvenile Court?
Abstract
Traditionally, adjudicatory hearings in juvenile court operated under the direction of the parens patriae doctrine, the state's obligation and license to care for children. Adjudications were achieved in informal, clinic-like sessions. The Supreme Court purportedly transformed juvenile court hearings into criminal-like trials via the Gault and Winship decisions. This research examines the extent to which juvenile court personnel currently perceive remnants of parens patriae in the adjudicatory hearing. One hundred workers (judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and probation officers) from three different juvenile courts (urban, suburban, and rural) were interviewed concerning sources of unfairness in the contemporary adjudicatory hearing. The results indicate that court workers see numerous obstacles to fairness in the juvenile court adjudicatory hearing. © 1994, SAGE Periodicals Press. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
1-1-1994
Publication Title
Crime & Delinquency
Volume
40
Issue
4
Number of Pages
599-615
Document Type
Article
Identifier
scopus
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128794040004008
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
84965484839 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84965484839
STARS Citation
Sanborn, Joseph B., "Remnants of Parens Patriae in the Adjudicatory Hearing: Is a Fair Trial Possible in Juvenile Court?" (1994). Scopus Export 1990s. 219.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus1990/219