Title

Comparing Two Context-Driven Approaches For Representation Of Human Tactical Behavior

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation that compared Context-based Reasoning (CxBR) and Contextual Graphs (CxG), two well-known context-driven approaches used to represent human intelligence and decision-making. The specific objective of this investigation was to compare and contrast both approaches to increase the readers understanding of each approach. We also identify which, if any, excels in a particular area, and to look for potential synergism between them. This comparison is presented according to 10 different criteria, with some indication of which one excels at each particular facet of performance. We focus the comparison on how each would represent human tactical behavior, either in a simulation or in the real world. Conceptually, these two context-driven approaches are not at the same representational level. This could provide an opportunity in the future to combine them synergistically. © 2008 Copyright Cambridge University Press 2008.

Publication Date

9-1-2008

Publication Title

Knowledge Engineering Review

Volume

23

Issue

3

Number of Pages

295-315

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888908001355

Socpus ID

51149121440 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/51149121440

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS