Title

The Construct Validity Of Conceptual And Operational Definitions Of Contextual Performance And Related Constructs

Keywords

Construct validity; Contextual performance; Organizational citizenship behavior; Role-taking theory; Task performance

Abstract

A number of theorists and researchers have distinguished between the constructs of task performance (i.e., non-discretionary work behaviors) and contextual performance (CP), as well as the related constructs of organizational citizenship behavior, prosocial behavior, and extra-role behavior. In addition, measures of CP have been used in a large number of studies that have attempted to show both their validity and utility. However, an analysis of the conceptual and operational definitions of the CP reveals a number of serious construct validity problems. For example, items in extant CP measures index what are typically regarded as required (non-discretionary) work behaviors. Thus, we describe several CP-related construct validity problems, and illustrate their nature using data from a sample of 98 job descriptions from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles and the online Occupational Information Network. The same data showed that behaviors that are generally viewed as representative of CP are frequently regarded as being exemplars of task performance. The important implications of the confounding of task performance and CP constructs are considered. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Publication Date

6-1-2009

Publication Title

Human Resource Management Review

Volume

19

Issue

2

Number of Pages

104-116

Document Type

Article

Personal Identifier

scopus

DOI Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.003

Socpus ID

61849132907 (Scopus)

Source API URL

https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/61849132907

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS