Title
Procedural Justice And Personality Testing: An Examination Of Concern And Typicality
Keywords
Applicant reactions; Organizational justice; Selection; Social comparisons
Abstract
Research in selection examines how organizational justice principles may influence applicants' reactions to selection procedures. This article extends this research by examining how two aspects of procedures - interpersonal treatment and social comparison information - affect reactions to a personality testing. The results of two studies demonstrate that interpersonal treatment (expression of concern for applicants' feelings) and social comparison information (description of testing as either typical or experimental) interact to affect test-takers' reactions. When concern was expressed and personality testing was described as typical, individuals responded less positively. However, when no concern was expressed, evaluations were more positive when testing was described as typical. The implications for organizational justice research and selection research are discussed.
Publication Date
12-1-2003
Publication Title
Group and Organization Management
Volume
28
Issue
4
Number of Pages
502-526
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103251234
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0242719677 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0242719677
STARS Citation
Ambrose, Maureen L. and Rosse, Joseph G., "Procedural Justice And Personality Testing: An Examination Of Concern And Typicality" (2003). Scopus Export 2000s. 1491.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/1491