Title
Anthropomorphism Of Robotic Forms: A Response To Affordances?
Abstract
Participants rated robotic forms on three scales: perceived aggression, intelligence, and animation. The robot bodies varied along five dimensions: Types of edges (beveled or squared), method of movement (wheels, legs, spider legs, or treads), number of movement generators (2 or 4), body position (upright or down), and presence of arms (present or absent). Across ratings, movement method and presence of arms were the strongest predictors of participant perceptions. Legs and arms, both human characteristics, were associated with more positive attributions. Minimal affective characteristics, as displayed by the body design, are important in user perceptions of use and ability.
Publication Date
12-1-2005
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Number of Pages
602-605
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
44349105370 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/44349105370
STARS Citation
Sims, Valerie K.; Chin, Matthew G.; and Sushil, David J., "Anthropomorphism Of Robotic Forms: A Response To Affordances?" (2005). Scopus Export 2000s. 3202.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/3202