Title
Sensitivity Of Fit Indexes To Misspecified Structural Or Measurement Model Components: Rationale Of Two-Index Strategy Revisited
Abstract
In previous research (Hu & Bentler, 1998, 1999), 2 conclusions were drawn: standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) was the most sensitive to misspecified factor covariances, and a group of other fit indexes were most sensitive to misspecified factor loadings. Based on these findings, a 2-index strategy - that is, SRMR coupled with another index - was proposed in model fit assessment to detect potential misspecification in both the structural and measurement model parameters. Based on our reasoning and empirical work presented in this article, we conclude that SRMR is not necessarily most sensitive to misspecified factor covariances (structural model misspecification), the group of indexes (TLI, BL89, RNI, CFI, Gamma hat, Me, or RMSEA) are not necessarily more sensitive to misspecified factor loadings (measurement model misspecification), and the rationale for the 2-index presentation strategy appears to have questionable validity. Copyright © 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Publication Date
9-26-2005
Publication Title
Structural Equation Modeling
Volume
12
Issue
3
Number of Pages
343-367
Document Type
Review
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
24944456035 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/24944456035
STARS Citation
Fan, Xitao and Sivo, Stephen A., "Sensitivity Of Fit Indexes To Misspecified Structural Or Measurement Model Components: Rationale Of Two-Index Strategy Revisited" (2005). Scopus Export 2000s. 3711.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/3711