Title
Comparing The Utility And Sequencing Of Different Types Of Feedback
Abstract
Despite the existence of an overabundance of research articles, reviews, and meta-analyses, there still appears to be disagreement regarding the feedback techniques that produce the most optimal learning conditions. The purpose of this research was to investigate two specific types of feedback, process and outcome, as well as the sequence in which these types of feedback should be presented as trainees learn to perform a simulated radar task. It was hypothesized that individuals receiving process feedback followed by outcome feedback would perform better on the simulated radar task than those receiving feedback in any other sequence. The results of this study indicate that individuals receiving feedback, regardless of the type and sequence, performed better at the end of training than those who did not receive feedback. No support was found for recommending a process-outcome feedback sequence.
Publication Date
1-1-2001
Publication Title
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Number of Pages
1843-1847
Document Type
Article; Proceedings Paper
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104502609
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
0442325640 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0442325640
STARS Citation
Van Duyne, Lori Rhodenizer; Jentsch, Kim; and Bowers, Clint, "Comparing The Utility And Sequencing Of Different Types Of Feedback" (2001). Scopus Export 2000s. 390.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/390