Title
Policy-Driven Versus Evidence-Based Conservation: A Review Of Political Targets And Biological Needs
Keywords
Biodiversity; Conservation goals; Conservation targets; Policy; Science
Abstract
"How much is enough?" is a question that conservationists, scientists, and policymakers have struggled with for years in conservation planning. To answer this question, and to ensure the long-term protection of biodiversity, many have sought to establish quantitative targets or goals based on the percentage of area in a country or region that is conserved. In recent years, policy-driven targets have frequently been faulted for their lack of biological foundation. In this manuscript, we reviewed 159 articles reporting or proposing 222 conservation targets and assessed differences between policy-driven and evidence-based approaches. Our findings suggest that the average percentages of area recommended for evidence-based targets were nearly three times as high as those recommended in policy-driven approaches. Implementing a minimalist, policy-driven approach to conservation could result in unanticipated decreases in species numbers and increases in the number of endangered species. © 2005 American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Publication Date
1-1-2005
Publication Title
BioScience
Volume
55
Issue
11
Number of Pages
989-995
Document Type
Review
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0989:PVECAR]2.0.CO;2
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
26644473734 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/26644473734
STARS Citation
Svancara, Leona K.; Brannon, Ree; and Scott, J. Michael, "Policy-Driven Versus Evidence-Based Conservation: A Review Of Political Targets And Biological Needs" (2005). Scopus Export 2000s. 4457.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/4457