Title
The Effect Of Varying The Causes Of Environmental Problems On Stated Wtp Values: Evidence From A Field Study
Keywords
Endangered species; Field experiment; Non-market valuation
Abstract
Standard applications of utility theory assume that utility depends solely on outcomes and not on causes. This study uses a field experiment conducted in the Netherlands to determine if alternative causes of an environmental problem affect willingness to pay to ameliorate it. We find evidence supporting the hypothesis that people are willing to pay significantly more to correct problems caused by humans than by nature (the "outrage effect"), but find no support for the hypothesis that "moral responsibility" matters. We also find support for the hypothesis that stated willingness to pay values obtained via "cheap talk" and "consequential" treatments are lower than without inclusion of these protocols. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date
1-1-2005
Publication Title
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume
49
Issue
2
Number of Pages
330-342
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.06.001
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
13844297945 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/13844297945
STARS Citation
Bulte, Erwin; Gerking, Shelby; List, John A.; and De Zeeuw, Aart, "The Effect Of Varying The Causes Of Environmental Problems On Stated Wtp Values: Evidence From A Field Study" (2005). Scopus Export 2000s. 4574.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/4574