Title
The Effect Of Solicitation And Independence On Corporate Bond Ratings
Keywords
Bond rating; Bond rating agencies; Corporate finance; Solicitation
Abstract
This comparison of solicited and independent bond rating agencies performance reveals that the ratings assigned by Moody's and Standard & Poor's are consistently lower than those assigned by Duff and Phelps and Fitch IBCA and are consistently higher than those assigned by MCM. While Moody's and S&P generally downgrade bond ratings sooner than Duff and Phelps and Fitch IBCA, the four major agencies upgrade at the same time. Moody's tends to have a higher upgrade magnitude than Duff and Phelps, but the downgrade magnitudes do not differ. MCM upgrades its ratings more quickly than either Moody's or S&P. The results give support to the timeliness and accuracy of ratings provided by the independent agencies. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2004.
Publication Date
11-1-2004
Publication Title
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting
Volume
31
Issue
9-10
Number of Pages
1327-1353
Document Type
Article
Personal Identifier
scopus
DOI Link
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2004.00576.x
Copyright Status
Unknown
Socpus ID
70349806495 (Scopus)
Source API URL
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/70349806495
STARS Citation
Feinberg, Martin; Shelor, Roger; and Jiang, James, "The Effect Of Solicitation And Independence On Corporate Bond Ratings" (2004). Scopus Export 2000s. 4667.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2000/4667